|
|
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
Year : 2015 | Volume
: 7
| Issue : 7 | Page : 306-309 |
|
Youtube as a source of information on Ebola virus disease
Ranjan Pathak1, Dilli Ram Poudel1, Paras Karmacharya1, Amrit Pathak2, Madan Raj Aryal1, Maryam Mahmood1, Anthony A Donato1
1 Department of Medicine, Reading Health System, West Reading, Pennsylvania, USA 2 Department of Medicine, Tribhuwan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
Date of Web Publication | 21-Jul-2015 |
Correspondence Address: Dr. Ranjan Pathak Reading Health System, 6th Ave and Spruce St, West Reading, Pennsylvania-19611 USA
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/1947-2714.161244
Background: The current West Africa epidemic of Ebola virus disease (EVD), which began from Guinea in December 2013, has been the longest and deadliest Ebola outbreak to date. With the propagation of the internet, public health officials must now compete with other official and unofficial sources of information to get their message out. Aims: This study aimed at critically appraising videos available on one popular internet video site (YouTube) as a source of information for Ebola virus disease (EVD). Materials and Methods: Videos were searched in YouTube (http://www.youtube.com) using the keyword "Ebola outbreak" from inception to November 1, 2014 with the default "relevance" filter. Only videos in English language under 10 min duration within first 10 pages of search were included. Duplicates were removed and the rest were classified as useful or misleading by two independent reviewers. Video sources were categorized by source. Inter-observer agreement was evaluated with kappa coefficient. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed using the Student t-test and Chi-squared test, respectively. Results: One hundred and eighteen out of 198 videos were evaluated. Thirty-one (26.27%) videos were classified as misleading and 87 (73.73%) videos were classified as useful. The kappa coefficient of agreement regarding the usefulness of the videos was 0.68 (P < 0.001). Independent users were more likely to post misleading videos (93.55% vs 29.89%, OR = 34.02, 95% CI = 7.55-153.12, P < 0.001) whereas news agencies were most likely to post useful videos (65.52% vs 3.23%, OR = 57.00, 95% CI = 7.40-438.74, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that majority of the internet videos about Ebola on YouTube were characterized as useful. Although YouTube seems to generally be a useful source of information on the current outbreak, increased efforts to disseminate scientifically correct information is desired to prevent unnecessary panic among the among the general population. Keywords: Ebola, information, YouTube, videos
How to cite this article: Pathak R, Poudel DR, Karmacharya P, Pathak A, Aryal MR, Mahmood M, Donato AA. Youtube as a source of information on Ebola virus disease. North Am J Med Sci 2015;7:306-9 |
How to cite this URL: Pathak R, Poudel DR, Karmacharya P, Pathak A, Aryal MR, Mahmood M, Donato AA. Youtube as a source of information on Ebola virus disease. North Am J Med Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2023 Mar 23];7:306-9. Available from: https://www.najms.org/text.asp?2015/7/7/306/161244 |
Introduction | |  |
The current West Africa epidemic of Ebola virus disease (EVD), which began from Guinea in December 2013, has been the longest and deadliest Ebola outbreak to date. [1] Ebola's method of transmission makes it amenable to containment by coordinated efforts from the public health community worldwide. [2] Those efforts include measures to keep citizens informed to prevent further spread and undue panic. [3] However, with the propagation of the internet, public health officials must now compete with other official and unofficial sources of information to get their message out. In view of these concerns, we attempted to critically appraise videos available on one popular internet video site (YouTube) as a source of information for EVD.
Materials and Methods | |  |
We searched YouTube (http://www.youtube.com) for videos using the keyword "Ebola outbreak" from inception to November 1, 2014 using the default "relevance" filter. The term "Ebola outbreak" was selected as the search term after sampling around 50 YouTube videos related to the Ebola outbreak. We included English language videos with primary content related to EVD with ≤10 min duration and restricted the search results to the first 10 pages [Figure 1]. Duplicate videos, videos without accompanying audio or >10 min duration were excluded. Two independent reviewers classified videos as useful (containing scientifically correct information about any aspect of the disease: epidemiology, symptoms, treatment, prevention) or misleading (containing at least one scientifically unproven information, e. g., EVD as man-made conspiracy or depopulation strategy) using a previously validated method. [4] We extracted the title, length, number of views, number of likes/dislikes, author and date uploaded for the videos. Video sources were also categorized into seven groups (viz. CDC, WHO, Red Cross, NGO/INGOs, academic health institutions/hospitals, news agencies and independent users). Inter-observer agreement was evaluated with kappa coefficient. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed using the Student t-test and Chi-squared test, respectively. A two tailed P - value of <0.05 was considered signifýcant. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) was used for the data analyses. | Figure 1: Flow chart showing systematic video search and selection process
Click here to view |
Results | |  |
Of the 198 videos screened, 118 videos met the inclusion criteria. 31 (26.27%) videos were classified as misleading and 87 (73.73%) videos were classified as useful. The kappa coefficient of agreement regarding the usefulness of the videos was 0.68 (P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the mean number of views, mean number of likes, mean number of days on YouTube between the two groups [Table 1]. The mean length of videos classified as misleading was longer than those classified as useful (6.44 vs 4.11 minutes, P < 0.001). Independent users were more likely to post misleading videos (93.55% vs 29.89%, OR = 34.02, 95% CI = 7.55-153.12, P < 0.001) whereas news agencies were most likely to post useful videos (65.52% vs 3.23%, OR = 57.00, 95% CI = 7.40-438.74, P < 0.001) [Table 1]. Examples of fallacious statements recorded from the misleading videos are given in [Supplementary Table 1 [Additional file 1] ]. | Table 1: Detailed characteristics of the misleading and useful youtube videos analyzed
Click here to view |
Discussion | |  |
Our study shows that majority of the internet videos about Ebola on YouTube were characterized as useful. The popularity of the videos (as measured by number of views and likes/day) between misleading and useful videos was similar. Studies in the past on the role of YouTube as a source of information for H 1 N 1 influenza [4] and immunization [5] have found similar results. Most videos uploaded from news agencies contained correct scientific information. The WHO and CDC were under-represented in the identified video collection (although often quoted in news agency videos) suggesting that those groups do not have immediate primary access to a majority of internet users who use YouTube as a source of information.
Conclusion | |  |
Although YouTube seems to generally be a useful source of information on the current outbreak, official health agencies should redouble their efforts to disseminate scientifically correct information on Ebola on sites such as YouTube and prevent unnecessary panic among the general population.
References | |  |
1. | Briand S, Bertherat E, Cox P, Formenty P, Kieny MP, Myhre JK, et al. The international Ebola emergency. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1180-3. |
2. | Gostin LO, Lucey D, Phelan A. The ebola epidemic: A global health emergency. JAMA 2014;312:1095-6. |
3. | Gonsalves G, Staley P. Panic, paranoia, and public health - the aids epidemic's lessons for Ebola. N Engl J Med 2014;371:2348-9. |
4. | Pandey A, Patni N, Singh M, Sood A, Singh G. YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Prev Med 2010;38:e1-3. |
5. | Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: A content analysis. JAMA 2007;298:2482-4.  [ PUBMED] |
[Figure 1]
[Table 1]
This article has been cited by | 1 |
Usefulness of YouTube in Sharing Information about New Gene Therapy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Content Analysis |
|
| Kyeong Yeol Kim, Chan Woong Jang, Seok Young Chung, Myungsang Kim, Sung-Rae Cho, Han Eol Cho | | Healthcare. 2023; 11(1): 147 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 2 |
Evaluation of the quality and the content of YouTube videos in Turkish on protection from coronavirus |
|
| Mustafa Alparslan BABAYIGIT | | Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine. 2022; 5(1): 301 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 3 |
It-which-must-not-be-named: COVID-19 misinformation, tactics to profit from it and to evade content moderation on YouTube |
|
| Dayane Fumiyo Tokojima Machado, Alexandre Fioravante de Siqueira, Natiely Rallo Shimizu, Leda Gitahy | | Frontiers in Communication. 2022; 7 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 4 |
A Noise Based Medical Elites Silence Model and Public Health Opinion Distortion in Social Networks |
|
| Jianliang Wei, Chi Qin, Hao Ji, Lingling Guo, Jingjing Chen, Yingying Xu | | Frontiers in Public Health. 2022; 9 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 5 |
COVID-Related Misinformation Migration to BitChute and Odysee |
|
| Olga Papadopoulou, Evangelia Kartsounidou, Symeon Papadopoulos | | Future Internet. 2022; 14(12): 350 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 6 |
Quality of English-language videos available on YouTube as a source of information on osteoporosis |
|
| Mustafa Erkut Onder, Cagatay Emir Onder, Orhan Zengin | | Archives of Osteoporosis. 2022; 17(1) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 7 |
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Intragastric Balloon Videos on YouTube |
|
| Akin Calisir, Ilhan Ece | | Obesity Surgery. 2022; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 8 |
Favorite YouTubers as a source of health information during quarantine: viewers trust their favorite YouTubers with health information |
|
| Pierre de Bérail, Catherine Bungener | | Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2022; 12(1) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 9 |
Assessing the Quality of Patient Information for Vestibular Schwannoma on the Open Source Video Sharing Platform YouTube |
|
| Lawrence Oh, Kevin Phan, Nicholas E. Jufas, Nirmal P. Patel | | Otology & Neurotology. 2022; 43(3): e316 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 10 |
YouTube
as a source of information on
COVID
-19 and dialysis
|
|
| Esra Nagehan Akyol Onder, Pelin Ertan | | Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis. 2022; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 11 |
Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Video Content about Perianal Fistulas |
|
| Ersan Eroglu, Ediz Altinli, Sweta Bhattacharya | | BioMed Research International. 2022; 2022: 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 12 |
Race/ethnicity, online information and COVID-19 vaccination: Study of minority immigrants’ internet use for health-related information |
|
| Annalise Baines, Hyunjin Seo, Muhammad Ittefaq, Fatemeh Shayesteh, Ursula Kamanga, Yuchen Liu | | Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 2022; : 1354856522 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 13 |
Are socio-demographic and economic characteristics good predictors of misinformation during an epidemic? |
|
| Elisa M. Maffioli, Robert Gonzalez, Peter Bai James | | PLOS Global Public Health. 2022; 2(3): e0000279 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 14 |
The COVID-19 Infodemic: Twitter versus Facebook |
|
| Kai-Cheng Yang, Francesco Pierri, Pik-Mai Hui, David Axelrod, Christopher Torres-Lugo, John Bryden, Filippo Menczer | | Big Data & Society. 2021; 8(1): 2053951721 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 15 |
YouTube as a source of information on the COVID-19 pandemic |
|
| Reynold Andika,Chien T. Kao,Christopher Williams,Young J. Lee,Hassan Al-Battah,Richard Alweis | | Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives. 2021; 11(1): 39 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 16 |
Comparison of Online Learning Video Platforms Regarding Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: YouTube and WebSurg |
|
| Bulent Citgez,Nurcihan Aygun,Banu Yigit,Mehmet Uludag | | Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2021; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 17 |
A Survey of YouTube Videos as a Source of Useful/Unuseful Information in the Field of the Prevention and Management of Burn Injuries: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the English Language Content |
|
| Kayhan Gurbuz, Mete Demir, Koray Das | | Journal of Burn Care & Research. 2021; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 18 |
Investigating Public Discourses Around Gender and COVID-19: a Social Media Analysis of Twitter Data |
|
| Ahmed Al-Rawi,Karen Grepin,Xiaosu Li,Rosemary Morgan,Clare Wenham,Julia Smith | | Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research. 2021; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 19 |
Evaluation of the quality of information on the internet about 2019 coronavirus outbreak in relation to orthodontics |
|
| Hatice Kübra Olkun,Refika Saliha Olkun | | Health and Technology. 2021; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 20 |
YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis |
|
| Mustafa Erkut Onder,Orhan Zengin | | Rheumatology International. 2021; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 21 |
Quality of healthcare information on YouTube: psoriatic arthritis |
|
| Mustafa Erkut Onder,Orhan Zengin | | Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie. 2021; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 22 |
The Networked Context of COVID-19 Misinformation: Informational Homogeneity on YouTube at the Beginning of the Pandemic |
|
| Daniel Röchert,Gautam Kishore Shahi,German Neubaum,Björn Ross,Stefan Stieglitz | | Online Social Networks and Media. 2021; : 100164 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 23 |
Videos, Views, and Vaccines: Evaluating the Quality of COVID-19 Communications on YouTube |
|
| Harleen K. Marwah, Kyle Carlson, Natalie A. Rosseau, Katherine C. Chretien, Terry Kind, Hope T. Jackson | | Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2021; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 24 |
YouTube as an information source during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross sectional study of Turkish video content |
|
| Serhat SIREKBASAN,Serap SUZUK | | Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine. 2021; 4(3): 340 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 25 |
YouTube Videos on Parkinson’s Disease are a Relevant Source of Patient Information |
|
| Anne K. Braczynski, Bergita Ganse, Stephanie Ridwan, Christian Schlenstedt, Jörg B. Schulz, Christoph Hoog Antink | | Journal of Parkinson's Disease. 2021; 11(2): 833 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 26 |
Infodemia: noticias falsas y tendencias de mortalidad por COVID-19 en seis países de América Latina |
|
| Giselly Mayerly Nieves-Cuervo,Edgar F. Manrique-Hernández,Angelo Fernando Robledo-Colonia,Elvia Karina Ardila Grillo | | Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública. 2021; 45: 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 27 |
Exploring Food Safety Messages in an Era of COVID-19: Analysis of YouTube Video Content |
|
| MERLYN THOMAS,PEYTON HAYNES,JUAN C. ARCHILA-GODI´NEZ,MAI NGUYEN,WENQING XU,YAOHUA FENG | | Journal of Food Protection. 2021; 84(6): 1000 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 28 |
The Utility of Social Media during an Emerging Infectious Diseases Crisis: A Systematic Review of Literature |
|
| Amit AGRAWAL,Ankita GUPTA | | Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2020; : 188 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 29 |
Youtube as an Information Source During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: Evaluation of the Turkish and English Content |
|
| Ömer Ataç,Yunus Can Özalp,Rifat Kurnaz,Osman Murat Güler,Meliksah Inamlik,Osman Hayran | | Cureus. 2020; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 30 |
The use of social media in outbreak communication |
|
| Yigit SENOL,Kadriye AVCI | | Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine. 2020; 3(3): 340 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 31 |
Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency |
|
| Daniel Allington,Bobby Duffy,Simon Wessely,Nayana Dhavan,James Rubin | | Psychological Medicine. 2020; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 32 |
YouTube as a source of medical information on the novel coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) pandemic |
|
| Ryan S. D’Souza,Shawn D’Souza,Natalie Strand,Alexandra Anderson,Matthew N. P. Vogt,Oludare Olatoye | | Global Public Health. 2020; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 33 |
Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in cardiopulmonary resuscitation videos shared on Open access video sharing platform YouTube |
|
| Sibel Yilmaz Ferhatoglu,Turkan Kudsioglu | | Australasian Emergency Care. 2020; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 34 |
YouTube as source of information on 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak: a cross sectional study of English and Mandarin content |
|
| Priyanka Khatri,Shweta R Singh,Neeta Kesu Belani,Yin Leng Yeong,Rahul Lohan,Yee Wei Lim,Winnie ZY Teo | | Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2020; : 101636 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 35 |
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Information on Nutrition After Bariatric Surgery on YouTube |
|
| Nazli Batar,Seda Kermen,Sezen Sevdin,Nida Yildiz,Duygu Güçlü | | Obesity Surgery. 2020; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 36 |
YouTube
as a Source of Medical Information About Spinal Cord Stimulation |
|
| Brendan Langford,William Michael Hooten,Shawn DæSouza,Susan Moeschler,Ryan S. DæSouza | | Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. 2020; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 37 |
YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation? |
|
| Heidi Oi-Yee Li,Adrian Bailey,David Huynh,James Chan | | BMJ Global Health. 2020; 5(5): e002604 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 38 |
Reliability and Educational Features of YouTube Videos About Hernia Operations Performed Using Laparoscopic TEP Method |
|
| Murat Kanlioz,Ugur Ekici | | Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2020; 30(1): 74 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 39 |
Evaluation of Korean-Language COVID-19–Related Medical Information on YouTube: Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study |
|
| Hana Moon,Geon Ho Lee | | Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020; 22(8): e20775 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 40 |
Commenting on PM Trudeau’s COVID-19 daily briefing in Canada: data mining public opinions and concerns on YouTube (Preprint) |
|
| Chengda Zheng,Jia Xue,Yumin Sun,Tingshao Zhu | | Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 41 |
Internet-Based Sources of Health Information: A Systematic Literature Review (Preprint) |
|
| Joana M Barros,James Duggan,Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann | | Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 42 |
Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media |
|
| Yuxi Wang,Martin McKee,Aleksandra Torbica,David Stuckler | | Social Science & Medicine. 2019; : 112552 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 43 |
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube |
|
| Murat Ferhat Ferhatoglu,Abdulcabbar Kartal,Ugur Ekici,Alp Gurkan | | Obesity Surgery. 2019; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 44 |
Comparison of New Era’s Education Platforms, YouTube® and WebSurg®, in Sleeve Gastrectomy |
|
| Murat Ferhat Ferhatoglu,Abdulcabbar Kartal,Ali Ilker Filiz,Abut Kebudi | | Obesity Surgery. 2019; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 45 |
Precision Global Health – The case of Ebola: a scoping review |
|
| Nefti-Eboni Bempong,Rafael Ruiz De Castañeda,Stefanie Schütte,Isabelle Bolon,Olivia Keiser,Gérard Escher,Antoine Flahault | | Journal of Global Health. 2019; 9(1) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 46 |
Analysis of YouTube as a Source of Information for Diabetic Foot Care |
|
| Peter E. Smith,James McGuire,Michael Falci,Dilli Ram Poudel,Richard Kaufman,Mary Ann Patterson,Benjamin Pelleschi,Esther Shin | | Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2019; 109(2): 122 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 47 |
Harnessing Big Data for Communicable Tropical and Sub-Tropical Disorders: Implications From a Systematic Review of the Literature |
|
| Vincenza Gianfredi,Nicola Luigi Bragazzi,Daniele Nucci,Mariano Martini,Roberto Rosselli,Liliana Minelli,Massimo Moretti | | Frontiers in Public Health. 2018; 6 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 48 |
Social media and outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases: A systematic review of literature |
|
| Lu Tang,Bijie Bie,Sung-Eun Park,Degui Zhi | | American Journal of Infection Control. 2018; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 49 |
Challenges of Vaccinations in the Era of New Media Communication |
|
| Minsoo Jung | | The Health Care Manager. 2018; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 50 |
Alzheimer’s Disease in Social Media: Content Analysis of YouTube Videos |
|
| Weizhou Tang,Kate Olscamp,Seul Ki Choi,Daniela B Friedman | | Interactive Journal of Medical Research. 2017; 6(2): e19 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 51 |
Qualitative analysis of Parkinson’s disease information on social media: the case of YouTube™ |
|
| Ibrahim Saleh Al-Busaidi,Tim J. Anderson,Yassar Alamri | | EPMA Journal. 2017; 8(3): 273 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 52 |
Zika Virus on YouTube: An Analysis of English-language Video Content by Source |
|
| Corey H. Basch,Isaac Chun-Hai Fung,Rodney N. Hammond,Elizabeth B. Blankenship,Zion Tsz Ho Tse,King-Wa Fu,Patrick Ip,Charles E. Basch | | Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. 2017; 50(2): 133 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 53 |
Ebola virus disease and social media: A systematic review |
|
| Isaac Chun-Hai Fung,Carmen Hope Duke,Kathryn Cameron Finch,Kassandra Renee Snook,Pei-Ling Tseng,Ana Cristina Hernandez,Manoj Gambhir,King-Wa Fu,Zion Tsz Ho Tse | | American Journal of Infection Control. 2016; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 54 |
Social Mediaæs Initial Reaction to Information and Misinformation on Ebola, August 2014: Facts and Rumors |
|
| Isaac Chun-Hai Fung,King-Wa Fu,Chung-Hong Chan,Benedict Shing Bun Chan,Chi-Ngai Cheung,Thomas Abraham,Zion Tsz Ho Tse | | Public Health Reports. 2016; 131(3): 461 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
 |
|