Inverse correlation between serum C-reactive protein and magnesium levels in smokers and nonsmokers

Muhamamd Atif Ata; Shumaila Shabbir Shaikh; Tehseen Iqbal; Hina; Daniyal Jamil; Rabiya Khan; Masharib Basheer Qazi; Telil Riwan

doi:10.4103/1947-2714.159337

Visit old site

Users Online: 597

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Year : 2015 | Volume : 7 | Issue : 6 | Page : 271-274

Inverse correlation between serum C-reactive protein and magnesium levels in smokers and nonsmokers

Muhamamd Atif Ata¹, Shumaila Shabbir Shaikh², Tehseen Iqbal¹, Hina³, Daniyal Jamil¹, Rabiya Khan¹, Masharib Basheer Qazi¹, Telil Riwan¹
¹ Department of Biochemistry, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
² Department of Biochemistry, Isra University, Hyderabad, Pakistan
³ Muhammadi Hospital, Latifabad, Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan

Date of Web Publication

25-Jun-2015

Correspondence Address:
Muhamamd Atif Ata
Assistant Professor of Biochemistry, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Sindh - 74200
Pakistan

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Check

DOI: 10.4103/1947-2714.159337

Abstract

Background: Smoking plays a key role in increasing the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP). Aims: To examine inverse correlation between CRP and magnesium levels in smokers and nonsmokers. Materials and Methods: A total of 192 healthy adult male subjects were included in the present study, out of which 96 were smokers and the remaining 96 were nonsmokers having age range from 20 to 40 years, and all the subjects belonged to District Matyari of Hyderabad. Serum CRP was measured by NycoCard standard kit method and magnesium levels by DiaSys standard kit method in smokers and nonsmokers. Results: The levels of serum CRP in smokers (14.62 ± 0.16 mg/L) is high as compared to nonsmokers (4.81 ± 0.38 mg/L), which is highly significant (P < 0.001). However, inverse results were seen for serum magnesium levels which were significantly higher (P < 0.001) in nonsmokers (2.52 ± 0.18 mg/L) as compared to the smokers (1.09 ± 0.38 mg/dL). A significant (P < 0.001) inverse relationship between serum CRP and magnesium concentrations were seen in smokers. Conclusion: This result shows that smoking increases serum CRP, an inflammatory marker parallel to decrease in serum magnesium levels in smokers having 20-40 years of age.

Keywords: C-reactive protein, Magnesium, Smoking

How to cite this article:
Ata MA, Shaikh SS, Iqbal T, Hina, Jamil D, Khan R, Qazi MB, Riwan T. Inverse correlation between serum C-reactive protein and magnesium levels in smokers and nonsmokers. North Am J Med Sci 2015;7:271-4

How to cite this URL:
Ata MA, Shaikh SS, Iqbal T, Hina, Jamil D, Khan R, Qazi MB, Riwan T. Inverse correlation between serum C-reactive protein and magnesium levels in smokers and nonsmokers. North Am J Med Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2023 Mar 22];7:271-4. Available from: https://www.najms.org/text.asp?2015/7/6/271/159337

Introduction

Chronic pulmonary diseases and cardiovascular diseases occur due to cigarette smoking. ^[1] C-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammatory marker that raises in inflammation that occurs due to smoking. ^[2],[3] Adipocytes and macrophages release cytokines which radically increases synthesis of CRP. ^[4],[5]

People with increased levels of CRP are on higher risk to develop obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and hypertension. ^[6],[7] It has been experienced that the smoker males had increased levels of serum CRP as compared to nonsmokers. ^[8] It has been observed that people with altered blood pressure and obesity has affected vascular endothelial function; it occurs due to hypomagnesaemia and increase in plasma levels of CRP in cellular processes. ^[9],[10] Healthy smokers have more insulin resistance which is a characteristics of metabolic syndrome as compared to nonsmokers.

It is also seen that they have also increased glucose levels, decreased high density lipoproteins (HDL) cholesterol, and much more very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) cholesterol. Since these variables are not direct measures of magnesium levels in smokers even then they clearly show that smoking decreases cellular magnesium concentration. ^[11]

The purpose of present study was to find out the inverse relation between serum levels of CRP and magnesium in smokers.

Systemic acute phase reaction occurs due to inflammation, ^[12] different studies calculated the level of circulating CRP which shows the severity of inflammation. ^{[13],[14],[15],[16],[17]} The major initiator, interlukin-6, released by hepatocyte increases the synthesis of CRP in acute phase reactants. ^{[18],[19],[20],[21]} CRPs causes neutrophil aggregation and activates tissue factor production. Magnesium intake was inversely associated with plasma CRP concentrations.

Materials and Methods

In this case-control study, we took 192 healthy subjects including 96 smokers and 96 nonsmokers (age range 20-40 years). All subjects belonged to Matyari district of Hyderabad. We assessed serum CRP and magnesium levels in smokers and nonsmokers. These levels were measured to assess the effect of smoking. A written consent was obtained from every subject who was involved in our study before taking blood sample. The ethical approval of the study was granted by the ethical committee. The serum levels for CRP and magnesium were determined by standard methods using NycoCard and DiaSys kits, respectively. We included all the patients, who were smokers but healthy, having no any associated diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, angina, or myocardial infarction.

Spirometry was not done, and we have ruled out any pathology concerned with lungs by history and symptoms, like they have no cough, tuberculosis (TB), or any associated diseases.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was restricted by the number of cases over a period of 18 months, but sample size was not determined. Pearson's correlation was used to determine the possible relation among the variables. Comparisons obtained in present study were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Comparisons of mean values between smokers and nonsmokers were done by using Student's t-test. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Results

[Table 1] shows the inverse relationship between serum CRP and magnesium levels in smokers and nonsmokers. The data shows that the mean serum CRP concentration in smokers (14.62 ± 0.16 mg/L) as against the nonsmokers (4.81 ± 0.38 mg/L) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].

Figure 1: Correlation between serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and magnesium (Mg) in smokers

Click here to view

Figure 2: Correlation between serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and magnesium in nonsmokers

Click here to view

Table 1: Comparison of serum C-reactive protein and magnesium levels between smokers and nonsmokers

Click here to view

Similarly, the mean serum magnesium concentration in nonsmokers (2.52 ± 0.18 mg/L) compared to smokers (1.09 ± 0.38 mg/L) was significantly higher (P < 0.001). Surprisingly, serum magnesium levels in all smokers were found to be less than 1.8 mg/dL, while serum CRP levels higher than 10 mg/L. On the contrary, all nonsmokers had their serum magnesium concentration greater than 2.0 mg/dL and serum CRP concentrations less than 7.5 mg/L.

The CRP to magnesium ratio in serum samples of smokers ranged between 0.73 and 5.0 as against 0.12 and 0.29 in nonsmokers, and it was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in smokers as compared to nonsmokers [Table 2]. This difference in the range of ratio clearly shows that decreased serum magnesium levels are independently related to high CRP levels in smokers [Figure 3].

Figure 3: Correlation between mean levels of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and magnesium (Mg) in smokers vs nonsmokers

Click here to view

Table 2: Comparison for C-reactive protein (CRP) to magnesium (Mg) ratio between smokers and nonsmokers

Click here to view

[Table 3] shows the analysis of two variables, that is, Mg ⁺² and CRP are highly negatively related with each other, which means that when one variable increases other will decrease and vice versa, the analysis also shows the strength of relation between two variables. The analysis also shows the strength of the relation between two variables. In this table, the strength is (−0.764), which shows that both variables are strongly negatively related and the results are significant at P < 0.001.

Table 3: Pearson correlation between serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and magnesium levels in smokers and nonsmokers

Click here to view

[Table 4] shows the normal range of body mass index (BMI) in both cases and control; hence, there is no obesity seen in both the groups.

Table 4: Comparison of age and body mass index (BMI) between healthy adult male smokers and nonsmokers

Click here to view

Discussion

In our study we have found that there is significantly increased level of serum CRP, which is supported by Das. ^[2] Malpuech-Brugére et al., ^[21] observed the early outcomes of magnesium deficiency in rats during inflammatory response; similarly, the present study also shows the deficiency of magnesium in inflammatory response.

The finding of the present study that smokers have increased level of CRP with decreased level of magnesium is fully supported by Khand et al. ^[22] Guerrero-Romero et al., ^[5] found that activated state of immune cells is the result of hypomagnesemia in nondiabetic, nonhypertensive, obese subjects; this also supports the present study. The study is also supported by that of Dana et al., ^[23] that individuals with low intake of magnesium were more likely to have increased CRPs.

The present study clearly demonstrated that smoking significantly decreases serum magnesium concentration and increases serum CRP concentration resulting in an inverse relationship between serum CRP and magnesium concentrations in smokers only. Our study is also justified by the Song et al., ^[24] that magnesium intake is inversely related with the CRPs in plasma for the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. According to another study of Mendenhall et al., ^[25] smoking, cardiovascular disease, and BMI have a great association with CRPs and we also found similar findings in our results with smoking. Another researcher Tracy et al., ^[26] justified our study in way that CRP have an association with the BMI, cardiovascular diseases, and smoking; ^[26] this study favors our results, but does not explain the inverse relationship between magnesium and CRPs.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to the authorities of Isra University for funding this study and also like to acknowledge the students of DUHS, Karachi and staff members for support and the collection of samples. We wish to thank Dr Syed Danish Haseen, Assistant Professor Biochemistry of Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi for his humbleness and greatfulness.

References

1.	Wannamethee SG, Lowe GD, Shaper AG, Rumley A, Lennon L, Whincup PH. Associations between cigarette smoking, pipe/cigar smoking, and smoking cessation, and haemostatic and inflammatory markers for cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1765-73.
2.	Das I. Raised C-reactive protein levels in serum from smokers. Clin Chim Acta 1985;153:9-13. [PUBMED]
3.	Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature 2002;420:868-74.
4.	Hastie CE, Haw S, Pell JP. Impact of smoking cessation and lifetime exposure on C - reactive protein. Nicotine Tob Res 2008;10:637-42.
5.	Guerrero-Romero F, Rodriguez-Moran M. Relationship between serum magnesium levels and C-reactive protein concentration, in non-diabetic, non-hypertensive obese subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26:469-74.
6.	Clyne B, Olshaker JS. The C-reactive protein. J Emerg Med 1999;17:1019-25.
7.	Pepys MB, Hirschfield GM. C-reactive protein: A critical update. J Clin Invest 2003;111:1805-12.
8.	Lau DC, Dhillon B, Yan H, Szmitko PE, Verma S. Adipokines: Molecular links between obesity and atherosclerosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005;288:H2031-41.
9.	Lopez-Garcia E, Schulze MB, Meigs JB, Manson JE, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, et al. Consumption of trans fatty acids is related to plasma biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. J Nutr 2005;135:562-6.
10.	Dehghan A, Kardys I, de Maat MP, Uitterlinden AG, Sijbrands EJ, Bootsma AH, et al. Genetic variation, C-reactive protein levels, and incidence of diabetes. Diabetes 2007;56:872-8.
11.	Lloyd-Jones DM, Liu K, Tian L, Greenland P. Narrative review: Assessment of C-reactive protein in risk prediction for cardiovascular disease. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:35-42.
12.	Pannen, BH, Robotham JL. The acute-phase response. New Horiz 1995;3:183-97.
13.	Liuzzo G, Biasucci LM, Gallimore JR, Grillo RL, Rebuzzi AG, Pepys MB, et al. The prognostic value of C-reactive protein and serum amyloid a protein in severe unstable angina. N Engl J Med 1994;331:417-24.
14.	Haverkate F, Thompson SG, Pyke SD, Gallimore JR, PepysMB. Production of C-reactive protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group. Lancet 1997;349:462-6.
15.	Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med 1997;336:973-9.
16.	Kuller LH, Tracy RP, Shaten J, Meilahn EN. Relation of C-reactive protein and coronary heart disease in the MRFIT nested case-control study. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Am J Epidemiol 1996;144:537-47.
17.	Tracy RP, Lemaitre RN, Psaty BM, Ives DG, Evans RW, Cushman M, et al. Relationship of C-reactive protein to risk of cardiovascular disease in the elderly. Results from the Cardiovascular Health Study and the Rural Health Promotion Project. Arterioscler Throm Vasc Biol 1997;17:1121-7.
18.	Mestries JC, Kruithof EK, Gascon MP, Herodin F, Agay D, Ythier A. In vivo modulation of coagulation and fibrinolysis by recombinant glycosylated human interleukin-6 in baboons. Eur Cytokine Netw 1994;5:273-81.
19.	Bataille R, Klein B. C-reactive protein levels as a direct indicator of interleukin-6 levels in humans in vivo. Arthritis Rheum 1992;35:982-4. [PUBMED]
20.	Lu ZY, Brailly H, Wijdenes J, Bataille R, Rossi JF, Klein B. Measurement of whole body interleukin-6 (IL-6) production: Prediction of the efficacy of anti-IL-6 treatments. Blood 1995;86:3123-31.
21.	Malpuech-Brugére C, Nowacki W, Daveau M, Gueux E, Linard C, Rock E, et al. Inflammatory response following acute magnesium deficiency in the rat. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000;1501:91-8.
22.	Khand F, Shaikh SS, Ata MA, Shaikh SS. Evaluation of the effect of smoking on complete blood counts, serum C-reactive proteins and magnesium levels in healthy adult male smokers. J Pak Med Assoc 2015;65:59-61. [PUBMED]
23.	Dana E, King DE, Arch G. Dietary magnesium and C-reactive protein levels. J Am Coll Nutr 2005;24:166-71.
24.	Song Y, Ridker PM, Manson JE, Cook NR, Buring JE, Liu S. Magnesium intake, C-reactive protein, and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in middle-aged and older U. S. women. Diabetes Care 2005;28:1438-44.
25.	Mendenhall MA, Patel P, Ballam L, Strachan D, Northfield TC. C reactive protein and its relationship to cardiovascular risk factors: A population-based cross sectional study. BMJ 1996;312:1061-5.
26.	Tracy RP, Psaty BM, Macy E, Bovill EG, Cushman M, Cornell ES, et al. Lifetime smoking exposure affects the association of C-reactive protein with cardiovascular disease risk factors and subclinical disease in healthy elderly subjects. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:2167-76.

Figures

[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]

Tables

[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]

This article has been cited by
1	Polysomnographic Assessment of Effects of Tobacco Smoking and Alcohol Consumption on Sleep Bruxism Intensity
	Weronika Frosztega, Mieszko Wieckiewicz, Dorian Nowacki, Monika Michalek-Zrabkowska, Rafal Poreba, Anna Wojakowska, Justyna Kanclerska, Grzegorz Mazur, Helena Martynowicz
	Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(24): 7453
	[Pubmed] \| [DOI]

2	Serum Magnesium Concentration Is Inversely Associated with Albuminuria and Retinopathy among Patients with Diabetes
	Jun Lu,Yuying Gu,Meixiang Guo,Peihong Chen,Hongtao Wang,Xuemei Yu
	Journal of Diabetes Research. 2016; 2016: 1
	[Pubmed] \| [DOI]